The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gaming.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous celebs were notably consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable websites providing both totally free casino-style games and rewarding prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'bet totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to point out claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as standard casinos, just without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the company faces allegations of prohibited sports betting in a New York claim that claims VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'create a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)

'I'm unsure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of stars from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences in between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - but not all - games are free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he frequently touts on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads usually center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for actual gaming losses.

Others lure customers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad displaying Drake's vehicles, planes and estates before rotating to video footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The inconsistency between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, most of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are sports betting totally free.

'Most social sweeps clients never make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming websites.'

Social gambling establishments provide consumers a possibility to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the choice to purchase valueless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be utilized to open various features within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, allowing clients to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's automobiles, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has actually assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not need typically need recognition. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to send mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully particular directions. What's more, players are often rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, consequently providing them a factor to try their hands at any variety of casino games for a chance to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to pay for a chance to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a crucial difference between social sweeps and traditional online sports betting sites like casinos.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that provide them the possibility to win rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself doesn't fulfill the definition of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all kinds of daily businesses in the United States, whatever from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous sports betting market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thus suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're normally not tied to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the attributes commonly associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payments, usually 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payment portion for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the earnings made by the business [normally less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, providing customers the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have considering that been shuttered over accusations of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is among a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should face similar examination.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have consistently been cited by courts and state attorney generals as key consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promo remained in fact a guise for illegal gambling.'

One of the gambling establishment industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up substantial tax and revenue chances as this gambling changes that carried out through regulated channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current claim, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New York state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'illegal gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have likewise been called as offenders in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's request for remark.

'We normally do not comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across most of North America, as we have for more than a years, creating not just fantastic games, user experiences and entertainment, however also ensuring this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly typical throughout the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to intensely protect any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The issues in between conventional online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting wagering 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong position against illegal gaming - particularly when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting allegedly unlawful gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise disregarded to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have an obligation to discuss to clients the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our worths are" our gamers precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious prohibited gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser said. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with illegal gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton